NAPCOR: Plastic bottle bans more harmful than recycling

NAPCOR: Plastic bottle bans more harmful than recycling

Sustainability

In light of recent discussions surrounding the environmental impact of plastic bottle bans in high-traffic areas like airports and stadiums, the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) sheds light on potential unintended consequences. Drawing from its 2023 Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), NAPCOR warns against the blanket prohibition of plastic bottles, highlighting the findings that suggest such bans could lead to greater environmental harm than good.

While the banning of plastic bottles in large venues is often touted as a step towards environmental conservation, NAPCOR's research indicates otherwise. According to the LCA results, recyclable PET bottles emerge as a more eco-friendly option compared to common alternatives in beverage packaging.

A case in point is the San Francisco Airport (SFO), which imposed a complete ban on the sale of plastic water bottles in August 2019. NAPCOR's LCA study reveals that the replacement of 9,000 plastic water bottles with aluminium cans daily has resulted in an estimated additional 1,100 metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions since the ban's initiation, surpassing the greenhouse gas impacts associated with plastic water bottles.

When evaluating various beverage delivery systems in the U.S., NAPCOR's LCA underscores the environmental superiority of PET beverage bottles over aluminium and glass counterparts. PET bottles boast several advantages, including 100% recyclability and the potential for manufacturing with 100% recycled content. Additionally, PET bottles exhibit lower impacts across critical environmental metrics such as greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, water usage, and emissions contributing to smog formation, acid rain, and eutrophication potential.

NAPCOR’s Executive Director, Laura Stewart, said: There’s a common and dangerous misconception regarding the impact of plastics versus other packaging materials. However, research unequivocally shows that when it comes to beverage packaging, the more sustainable answer is polyethylene terephthalate, better known as PET. Large venues are touting environmental benefits with a ban on plastic containers; in fact, these moves are counterproductive and ultimately cause more harm than good.

Latest Packaging News

Discover YPS packaging machines at upcoming September events
Supplier News

Discover YPS packaging machines at upcoming September events

September will see two opportunities to come and see Yorkshire Packaging Systems (YPS) automated...
KB Packaging: Why is packaging important to fulfilment, 3PL and ecommerce?
Supplier News

KB Packaging: Why is packaging important to fulfilment, 3PL and ecommerce?

Fulfilment, 3PL, and ecommerce are fast paced environments and speed is essential, but the...
PHS: Working smarter for commercial and industrial manufacturing efficiency
Supplier News

PHS: Working smarter for commercial and industrial manufacturing efficiency

Businesses of all sizes face the logistics headache of unloading products and goods, both in...
Australian government funds new soft plastics recycling facility
Sustainability

Australian government funds new soft plastics recycling facility

South Australia will divert over 14,000 tonnes of soft plastics from landfills annually, thanks to...
Müller boosts packaging accessibility with NaviLens codes
Technology

Müller boosts packaging accessibility with NaviLens codes

Müller Yogurt & Desserts is partnering with NaviLens to increase accessibility for blind and...