NAPCOR: Plastic bottle bans more harmful than recycling

Aluminium recycling public domain
Sustainability

In light of recent discussions surrounding the environmental impact of plastic bottle bans in high-traffic areas like airports and stadiums, the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) sheds light on potential unintended consequences. Drawing from its 2023 Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), NAPCOR warns against the blanket prohibition of plastic bottles, highlighting the findings that suggest such bans could lead to greater environmental harm than good.

While the banning of plastic bottles in large venues is often touted as a step towards environmental conservation, NAPCOR's research indicates otherwise. According to the LCA results, recyclable PET bottles emerge as a more eco-friendly option compared to common alternatives in beverage packaging.

A case in point is the San Francisco Airport (SFO), which imposed a complete ban on the sale of plastic water bottles in August 2019. NAPCOR's LCA study reveals that the replacement of 9,000 plastic water bottles with aluminium cans daily has resulted in an estimated additional 1,100 metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions since the ban's initiation, surpassing the greenhouse gas impacts associated with plastic water bottles.

When evaluating various beverage delivery systems in the U.S., NAPCOR's LCA underscores the environmental superiority of PET beverage bottles over aluminium and glass counterparts. PET bottles boast several advantages, including 100% recyclability and the potential for manufacturing with 100% recycled content. Additionally, PET bottles exhibit lower impacts across critical environmental metrics such as greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, water usage, and emissions contributing to smog formation, acid rain, and eutrophication potential.

NAPCOR’s Executive Director, Laura Stewart, said: There’s a common and dangerous misconception regarding the impact of plastics versus other packaging materials. However, research unequivocally shows that when it comes to beverage packaging, the more sustainable answer is polyethylene terephthalate, better known as PET. Large venues are touting environmental benefits with a ban on plastic containers; in fact, these moves are counterproductive and ultimately cause more harm than good.

Latest Packaging News

Rowlinson Packaging protects high-value AI hardware with timber crate solutions
Supplier News

Rowlinson Packaging protects high-value AI hardware with timber crate solutions

As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption accelerates, the global demand for AI infrastructure...
Viscose Closures: Choosing the right cork – A guide for wine and spirits producers
Supplier News

Viscose Closures: Choosing the right cork – A guide for wine and spirits producers

Selecting the right cork stopper is a crucial decision for both winemakers and spirit producers....
London Packaging Week hosts first major industry discussion since EPR launch
Events

London Packaging Week hosts first major industry discussion since EPR launch

Leading experts from Defra, PackUK, and the Food & Drink Federation will discuss how recent...
JD Wetherspoon reports £2.4m packaging waste costs under EPR scheme
Business

JD Wetherspoon reports £2.4m packaging waste costs under EPR scheme

JD Wetherspoon has disclosed that it expects to incur around £2.4 million in costs this year under...
CalRecycle study finds 8.5m tonnes of packaging sent to landfill in California
Sustainability

CalRecycle study finds 8.5m tonnes of packaging sent to landfill in California

Nearly 8.5 million tonnes of single-use packaging and food-service items were sent to landfill in...