SUPER DRY: Research highlights hidden moisture risks in coffee shipments

Coffee Packaging influencing European consumer choices
Supplier News

Most people think coffee spoils on the farm. It can also spoil on the ship.

Green coffee is considered safe to export when its bulk moisture sits between 10 and 12 percent. That has been the industry standard for decades, backed by the International Coffee Organization and ISO guidelines.

New research from coffee education platform Change of Tone suggests that number alone is not the full picture.

The average hides the real problem

Coffee is hygroscopic, meaning it constantly absorbs and releases moisture based on its surroundings. On a 4 to 8 week ocean voyage, temperature swings between day and night trigger condensation inside the container, sometimes called “container rain.” That moisture does not spread evenly. It concentrates on the surface of individual beans, creating localised spikes in what scientists call water activity (aW), a measure of how much free moisture is available for biological growth.

The threshold that matters: 0.70 aW. Above that level, mold and yeast can take hold. A shipment can test clean on bulk moisture and still cross that threshold in isolated pockets, wet spots that do not show up on the paperwork.

Why this matters beyond quality

When mold develops, it can produce Ochratoxin A, a mycotoxin that survives roasting even after the mold itself is destroyed by heat. That shifts the conversation from a cupping score issue to a food safety issue.

Two levers exporters can control

The research highlights packaging as one variable: traditional jute bags are breathable but absorb ambient humidity readily, while hermetic and vacuum-sealed options act as a physical barrier against fluctuating conditions.

The other variable is humidity inside the container itself. Calcium chloride desiccants work by actively pulling moisture out of the container air throughout the voyage, reducing the condensation that creates those localised mold-risk pockets in the first place.

Packaging and desiccant protection are not competing solutions. They address different parts of the same exposure.

This article was originally published by SUPER DRY.

Latest Packaging News

GTA VI code-in-box release raises questions over video game packaging
Technology

GTA VI code-in-box release raises questions over video game packaging

The use of physical packaging for digitally downloaded video games has prompted discussion over...
Viscose achieves OK compost HOME certification for plastic-free shrink sleeves
Supplier News

Viscose achieves OK compost HOME certification for plastic-free shrink sleeves

We are very excited to share that we have achieved OK compost HOME certification from TÜV AUSTRIA...
Bandall: How printing companies can bundle more efficiently
Supplier News

Bandall: How printing companies can bundle more efficiently

After all the work that goes into printing and finishing a product, the last thing you want is for...
TIPA: Compostable vs. biodegradable tea packaging – what’s the difference?
Supplier News

TIPA: Compostable vs. biodegradable tea packaging – what’s the difference?

Sustainability claims have become common across the tea aisle, but the words used on packaging do...
KRONUS: PPWR and wooden packaging – what the new EU regulation means for rour business
Supplier News

KRONUS: PPWR and wooden packaging – what the new EU regulation means for rour business

Packaging requirements in Europe are changing. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)...