MPMA: EPR fees threaten the future of metal food cans

The Metal Packaging Manufacturers Association (MPMA) has expressed concerns over the government's proposed Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR) fee structure, warning that it could have a significant impact on the metal food can industry, which plays a critical role in UK food security.

The MPMA argues that the current pEPR fee structure may result in what it describes as a "serious market distortion," potentially leading to the decline of metal food cans. These cans are valued for their long shelf life and sustainability, making them essential for preserving food and ensuring UK food security. The association believes the government has not sufficiently accounted for the differences in material densities when calculating the fees for various packaging materials.

Representing 22 metal packaging companies, the MPMA has formally addressed its concerns in letters to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade and the Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. The trade body warns that, unless the fee structure is revised, it may contradict the government's objectives of reducing packaging waste, increasing recycling rates, and promoting a circular economy.

Jason Galley, MPMA Director and Chief Executive says: Our study of the illustrative packaging Extended Producer Responsibility fees shows that the base fees for metal cans are significantly higher than for containers made from less circular materials.

Ultimately, this could lead to the loss of the metal food can, an iconic presence in kitchen cupboards, as manufacturers turn away from producing metal packaging which, despite its ability to be recycled over and over, could be priced out of the market.

Read MPMA’s view in detail here.